Impacto de las fracturas por fragilidad en mujeres españolas con osteoporosis posmenopáusica / Impact of fragility fractures in postmenopausal Spanish women with osteoporosis

Objetivo: dada la repercusión que tienen las fracturas por fragilidad y sus secuelas en la vida de las mujeres con osteoporosis posmenopáusica (OPM), el objetivo de este estudio es describir y analizar su impacto en esta población. Material y métodos: se realizó una encuesta a mujeres posmenopáusicas con fractura por fragilidad en un diseño observacional transversal. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, impacto de la fractura (necesidad de cuidados, productividad laboral), calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS, mediante cuestionario QUALEFFO-31) y disposición a pagar (DAP) por recuperarla. Resultados: participaron 120 mujeres, promedio de edad 62 ± 7 años. Las fracturas más frecuentes fueron las de radio distal (29,9 %) y las vertebrales (21,3 %). Un 53,3 % necesitó cuidados durante su recuperación (76,5 % informales; 24,9 % formales) y un 4,2 % tuvo que ingresar en un centro/residencia sociosanitaria. De aquellas que trabajaban cuando se produjo la fractura (62,5 %), el 56 % vio su vida laboral afectada (69,3 % incapacidad temporal; 17,3 % incapacidad permanente; 10,7 % reducción de jornada; 10,7 % abandono laboral; 5,3 % permiso/excedencia; 3,6 % prejubilación). El impacto de la fractura se debió principalmente al dolor (71,7 %), dificultad para realizar actividades cotidianas (48,3 %), problemas de movilidad (46,7 %) y estado emocional (41,7 %). La mayor DAP se ofreció por recuperar la capacidad para realizar actividades cotidianas y el estado emocional. La puntuación total QUALEFFO-31 (0-100) fue 49,9 ± 10,8 (función mental: 68,3 ± 7,3; dolor: 56 ± 22,6; función física: 39,3 ± 15,5). Conclusiones: las fracturas por fragilidad tienen un alto impacto en la calidad de vida de las mujeres con OPM. Resulta fundamental poner en valor aquellos aspectos que más les preocupan para optimizar su abordaje. (AU)

Objective: Given the impact of fragility fractures and their consequences on the lives of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), the objective of this study is to describe and analyze the impact of this kind of fractures on this population. Materials and methods: A survey was conducted among postmenopausal women with fragility fractures in a cross-sectional observational design. Sociodemographic variables, fracture impact (need for care, work productivity), and data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL, assessed using the QUALEFFO-31 questionnaire), and willingness to pay (WTP) to regain HRQoL were collected. Results: A total of 120 women participated, with a mean age of 62 ± 7 years. The most frequent fractures described were distal radius fractures (29.9 %), followed by vertebral fractures (21.3 %). A total of 53.3 % required care during their recovery (76.5 %, informal; 24.9 %, formal), and 4.2 % had to be admitted to a health care or nursing home. Among those who were working when the fracture occurred (62.5 %), 56 % had their working life affected (69.3 %, temporary disability; 17.3 %, permanent disability; 10.7 %, reduced working hours; 10.7 %, quit their jobs; 5.3 %, leave of absence; and 3.6 %, early retirement). The impact of the fracture was primarily due to pain (71.7 %), difficulty performing activities of daily living (48.3 %), mobility problems (46.7 %), and emotional state (41.7 %). The highest WTP was offered to regain the ability to perform activities of daily living and improve the emotional state. The overall QUALEFFO-31 score (0-100) was 49.9 ± 10.8 (mental function, 68.3 ± 7.3; pain, 56 ± 22.6; physical function, 39.3 ± 15.5). Conclusions: Fragility fractures play a significant role on the quality of life of women with PMO. It is of paramount importance to value the aspects that concern them the most to optimize their management. (AU)

Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.

REFRA-FLS is a new registry in Spain aimed at identifying individuals over 50 years of age with a fragility fracture. Using this registry, we found hip fracture is the most prevalent fracture. Treatment for osteoporosis was 87.7%, with 65.3% adherence. REFRA-FLS provides fundamental data in the study of fragility fractures. PURPOSE: Fragility fractures are a growing public health concern in modern-aged societies. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been shown to successfully lower rates of secondary fractures. A new registry (REFRA-FLS) has been created to monitor quality indicators of FLS units in Spain and to explore the occurrence and characteristic of fragility fractures identified by these centers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study based on fragility fractures recorded in the REFRA-FLS registry. Participants were individuals 50 years or above who suffered a low energy fragility fracture identified by the 10 participating FLS units during the study period. The type of FLS unit, the characteristics of the individuals at baseline, along with patient outcomes as quality indicators among those who completed 1 year of follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2965 patients and 3067 fragility fractures were identified, and the most frequent locations were hip (n = 1709, 55.7%) and spine (n = 492, 16.0%). A total of 43 refractures (4.5%) and 46 deaths (4.9%) were observed among 948 individuals in the follow-up analyses. Time from fracture to evaluation was less than 3 months in 76.7% of individuals. Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed in 87.7%, and adherence was 65.3% in Morisky-Green test. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a comprehensive picture of fragility fractures identified in FLS units from Spain. Overall, quality indicators are satisfactory although a much higher use of DXA would be desirable. As the registry grows with the incorporation of new FLS units and longer follow-up, incoming analyses will provide valuable insight.

Long term effects on biochemical bone markers of a single infusion of zoledronic acid in Paget disease of bone.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to evaluate long term biochemical response to a single dose of zoledronic acid in patients with Paget disease of bone, as well as evaluating the value of bone turnover markers in diagnosis and follow-up. METHODS: This is an observational, descriptive and prospective study. Included patients received a single-dose intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid. Bone turnover markers were measured at baseline, and in every follow up visit. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with a mean follow-up of 56.49 months were included. At the time Paget disease was diagnosed, all of the patients (100%) had high serum procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide values, but not all patients had high serum C-terminal telopeptide and alkaline phosphatase values (85% and 89% respectively). Biochemical response to therapy occurred in 38 out of 39 patients (97%). Two patients had partial response at 6 months but complete response thereafter. Only one patient relapsed (nadir procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide 35.06 µg/l, value at relapse 75.2 µg/l) 4.5 years after treatment. Values of serum C-terminal telopeptide and alkaline phosphatase of this patient were normal despite P1NP relapse. CONCLUSIONS: We hence conclude that zoledronic acid is effective in inducing and maintaining biochemical remission and that procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide is a better diagnostic and prognostic marker in PDB when compared to C-terminal telopeptide and alkaline phosphatase.

The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Several antiresorptive drugs, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, are currently available for the treatment of osteoporosis due to their evidenced efficacy in reducing fracture risk at mid-term. Osteoanabolic therapies, like teriparatide, whose treatment duration is limited to 2 years, have also shown efficacy in the reduction of fracture risk. However, depending on the severity of osteoporosis and the presence of other associated risk factors for fracture, some patients may require long-term treatment to preserve optimal bone strength and minimize bone fracture risk. Given the limited duration of some treatments, the fact that most of the antiresorptive drugs have not been assessed beyond 10 years, and the known long-term safety issues of these drugs, including atypical femoral fractures or osteonecrosis of the jaw, the long-term management of these patients may require an approach based on drug discontinuation and/or switching. In this regard, interest in sequential osteoporosis therapy, wherein drugs are initiated and discontinued over time, has grown in recent years, although the establishment of an optimal and individualized order of therapies remains controversial. This review reports the currently available clinical evidence on the discontinuation effects of different anti-osteoporotic drugs, as well as the clinical outcomes of the different sequential treatment regimens. The objective of this article is to present up-to-date practical knowledge on this area in order to provide guidance to the clinicians involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis.

Vacaciones terapéuticas en osteoporosis: estrategia en el tratamiento a largo plazo con bifosfonatos / Therapeutic holidays in osteoporosis: long-term strategy of treatment with bisphosphonates

Los bifosfonatos (BF) orales son fármacos ampliamente utilizados en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis y se sitúan como primera línea de tratamiento para la osteoporosis en la mayoría de las guías clínicas. Son fármacos eficaces que reducen la aparición de fracturas e incluso disminuyen la mortalidad. Debido a su gran afinidad por el tejido óseo, los BF han demostrado que, incluso cuando se interrumpe su administración, siguen ofreciendo un efecto protector sobre la densidad mineral ósea e incluso sobre la aparición de nuevas fracturas. Sin embargo, su uso prolongado durante años se ha relacionado con la aparición de algunas complicaciones, como la osteonecrosis mandibular o las fracturas atípicas de fémur, que han cuestionado la duración del tratamiento con estos fármacos y abierto la posibilidad de realizar interrupciones, definitivas o temporales, reconocidas como «vacaciones terapéuticas». Así, en pacientes tratados con BF durante un período de 3 a 5 años con riesgo bajo de fractura, se aconseja retirar el fármaco y reiniciarlo cuando vuelva a presentar indicación de tratamiento. En cambio, en pacientes con riesgo moderado, se aconseja realizar vacaciones terapéuticas y reevaluar a los 2-3 años para reiniciar el tratamiento. Por el contrario, en aquellos pacientes con riesgo elevado de fractura no debería retirarse el tratamiento (AU)

Oral bisphosphonates (BF) are drugs widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis and placed as first-line treatment for osteoporosis in most clinical guidelines. BF are effective drugs that reduce the incidence of fractures and even reduce mortality. Because of their great affinity for bone, BF have shown that even when they are discontinued still offer a latent protective effect on bone mineral density, maintaining their anti-fracture effect. However, prolonged use for years has been linked to the gradual emergence of complications such as osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femur fractures, which have raised questions as when to hold and when to make a final or temporary break, recognized as periods of rest or 'therapeutic holidays' of these drugs. Thus, in patients treated with BF for a period of 3-5 years with a low risk of fracture, the drug should be discontinued and restarted when there is an indication for treatment. In contrast, in patients with moderate risk, therapeutic holidays are advised, while reassessing after 2-3 years for restarting purposes. Finally, in patients with high risk of fracture, treatment with BF should not be withdra (AU)

[Therapeutic holidays in osteoporosis: Long-term strategy of treatment with bisphosphonates]. / Vacaciones terapéuticas en osteoporosis: estrategia en el tratamiento a largo plazo con bifosfonatos.

Oral bisphosphonates (BF) are drugs widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis and placed as first-line treatment for osteoporosis in most clinical guidelines. BF are effective drugs that reduce the incidence of fractures and even reduce mortality. Because of their great affinity for bone, BF have shown that even when they are discontinued still offer a latent protective effect on bone mineral density, maintaining their anti-fracture effect. However, prolonged use for years has been linked to the gradual emergence of complications such as osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femur fractures, which have raised questions as when to hold and when to make a final or temporary break, recognized as periods of rest or "therapeutic holidays" of these drugs. Thus, in patients treated with BF for a period of 3-5 years with a low risk of fracture, the drug should be discontinued and restarted when there is an indication for treatment. In contrast, in patients with moderate risk, therapeutic holidays are advised, while reassessing after 2-3 years for restarting purposes. Finally, in patients with high risk of fracture, treatment with BF should not be withdrawn.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la osteoporosis en mayores de 75 años / Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in persons aged more than 75 years

ResumenLa osteoporosis (OSP) es una enfermedad progresiva del esqueleto, caracterizada por la disminución de la resistencia ósea que facilita el desarrollo de fracturas. Constituye el segundo problema sanitario asistencial en el mundo después de las enfermedades cardiovasculares, según la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Su prevalencia va en aumento dado el progresivo envejecimiento de la población.ResumenDurante el envejecimiento continúa la pérdida de masa ósea, tanto a nivel de la columna vertebral como de la cadera, que se ha iniciado en la posmenopausia en las mujeres y alrededor de los 60 años en los varones. En la senectud es además cuando se producen la gran mayoría de las fracturas por fragilidad ósea, cuya incidencia aumenta exponencialmente en los mayores de 75 años.ResumenEn la actualidad disponemos de diversos tratamientos para la OSP que han demostrado su eficacia en aumentar la densidad mineral ósea y disminuir el riesgo de fracturas. Sin embargo, no deja de ser sorprendente que la evidencia científica respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de estos tratamientos en los pacientes de mayor edad es mucho más escasa en comparación con la de poblaciones más jóvenes. Así, son escasos los datos respecto a su efecto frente a las fracturas no vertebrales y en concreto la fractura de cadera en los pacientes mayores. Por ello, con esta revisión pretendemos analizar las evidencias científicas en cuanto al diagnóstico y tratamiento de la OSP, y en particular la eficacia antifractura en pacientes mayores de 75 años de los distintos fármacos antiresortivos y osteoformadores que tenemos en la actualidad disponibles para el tratamiento de la OSP(AU)

Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disease characterized by a decrease in bone strength and an increase in the number of fractures. This disease is considered by the World Health Organization to be the second most important health problem in the world after cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing due to population aging.AbstractWith age, the loss of bone mass in the spine and hip, which starts at menopause in women and around the age of 60 years in men, continues. Old age is when most fragility fractures occur and the incidence of these fractures is increasing exponentially in persons aged more than 75 years.AbstractSeveral treatments with demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing fracture risk and increasing bone mineral density are currently available for osteoporosis. Nevertheless, the scientific evidence on the safety and efficacy of these treatments is much scarcer in older people than in young populations. There are few reports on the efficacy of these treatments in non-vertebral – specifically hip – fractures in the elderly. Consequently, the present review aims to analyze the scientific evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, and particularly the evidence on the antifracture efficacy of distinct antiresorptive agents and anabolic drugs in people older than 75 years(AU)

[Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in persons aged more than 75 years]. / Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la osteoporosis en mayores de 75 años.

Osteoporosis is a progressive skeletal disease characterized by a decrease in bone strength and an increase in the number of fractures. This disease is considered by the World Health Organization to be the second most important health problem in the world after cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing due to population aging. With age, the loss of bone mass in the spine and hip, which starts at menopause in women and around the age of 60 years in men, continues. Old age is when most fragility fractures occur and the incidence of these fractures is increasing exponentially in persons aged more than 75 years. Several treatments with demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing fracture risk and increasing bone mineral density are currently available for osteoporosis. Nevertheless, the scientific evidence on the safety and efficacy of these treatments is much more scarce in older people than in young populations. There are few reports on the efficacy of these treatments in non-vertebral--specifically hip--fractures in the elderly. Consequently, the present review aims to analyze the scientific evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, and particularly the evidence on the antifracture efficacy of distinct antiresorptive agents and anabolic drugs in people older than 75 years.